OUR PARTNERS:      HRHERO    TRAINING TODAY    HRLAWS    ECN    MLEESMITH    Help
     Thursday, March 18, 2010 - Updated 10:11pm CST    
That's what she said  Employment Law Post    

Archive for August, 2007

Women’s Appreciation

August 31, 2007 at 7:37 am by: Julie Elgar

LITIGATION VALUE: 1,000,000 +
The “women’s appreciation” meeting was a bad idea that was poorly executed. I’m not saying that Dunder Mifflin cannot or should not recognize the achievements of its female employees. It should. I just think that the meeting shouldn’t be announced by saying “I know the crap out of women” and should not [...]

Product Recall Revisited

August 24, 2007 at 7:20 am by: Julie Elgar

Remember when I said that being a jerk wasn’t illegal? Well, that may change. According to an article in the L.A. Times, legislatures in New Jersey, New York, Vermont and Washington are considering bills which would give employees the right to seek damages if their employer creates an “abusive work environment.” I’m [...]

The Negotiation Revisited

August 17, 2007 at 6:41 am by: Julie Elgar

Litigation Value: $350,000
Employers who fail to fire employees who tape pepper spray canisters, nunchucks, and throwing stars to the bottom of their desks are playing with fire. Expensive fire. Sure, Roy started it, and I’m glad Dunder Mifflin fired him. But what about Dwight? After all, the man kept weapons at work for God knows [...]

Cocktails Revisited

August 10, 2007 at 6:15 am by: Julie Elgar

Litigation Value: $75,000 (I’m sticking with my earlier assessment)
A number of people have asked me whether Jan could really be fired for dating Michael. My answer? Probably. Well, at least in most states. Employers can, and often do, implement policies prohibiting their employees from engaging in romantic relationships with co-workers and, [...]

Business School Revisited

August 3, 2007 at 6:43 am by: Julie Elgar

Litigation Value: 33 million????
Typically, the workplace is not an appropriate location to practice “creative discipline.” Such “creativity” can be, and often is, misconstrued. Take, for example, Ryan. Michael was retaliating against him for making disparaging remarks about the company. Probably not illegal but easily could have been had Ryan [...]