OUR PARTNERS:      HRHERO    TRAINING TODAY    HRLAWS    ECN    MLEESMITH    Help
     Tuesday, February 09, 2010 - Updated 04:36am CST    
 Northern Exposure     Employment Law Post    

What Happens When Child Care and Work Conflict – More Guidance for Employers

February 8, 2010 at 9:00 pm by: Wendi Watts

By Ralph Nero and Ida Martin

Continue Reading »

To What Extent Must Employees’ Family Obligations Be Accommodated?

February 1, 2010 at 9:00 pm by: Northern Exposure

By Dominique Launay

Your employee is a single parent. He has to drop his children off at school each morning. They can’t be dropped off earlier than 9 a.m. He has to be back at the school by 5 p.m. to pick them up from their after-school care. He has no family to assist him. Is he covered by the family-status protections in some provinces’ human rights legislation? Do you have to accommodate him?

Continue Reading »

When Must Individual Contractors Receive Reasonable Notice?

January 25, 2010 at 9:00 pm by: Northern Exposure

By Donna Gallant

A recent appeal court decision demonstrates once again that defining work relationships is far from an exact science. Somewhere on the spectrum between employees and independent contractors, we have seen the emergence of “dependent contractors.” What hasn’t been entirely clear is how one determines “dependent contractor” status.  Nor what that status means in terms of the worker’s entitlements on termination.

Continue Reading »

Mandatory Retirement Being Retired across Canada

January 18, 2010 at 9:00 pm by: Derek Knoechel

Mandatory retirement has a long and storied history as part of the Canadian labor system. As we enter 2010, it appears that a new chapter is being written, one in which mandatory retirement is the exception rather than the norm.

Continue Reading »

Ontario Adds to Broad Canadian Harassment/Violence Laws

January 11, 2010 at 9:00 pm by: Northern Exposure

By Alix Herber

Canada’s two largest provinces — Ontario and Quebec — now have laws requiring employers to seek to provide workplaces free of “harassment.” No longer limited to human rights-related harassment, the term is broadly defined in these laws. Further, Ontario’s new law extends beyond harassment. It, like the federal law, also will require antiviolence policies and programs. These laws will apply regardless of whether a workplace has any prior history of such problems.

Continue Reading »

Drug and Alcohol Testing – What’s Permitted in the Canadian Workplace

December 28, 2009 at 9:00 pm by: Northern Exposure

By Hadiya Roderique

Last year we reported on a case where a Canadian employer was ordered to reinstate an employee who had tested positive for marijuana following a verbal altercation with his employer. Why? Because drug addiction is considered a disability in Canada. And individuals who suffer from addiction are protected from discrimination under human rights legislation.

Continue Reading »

Does Temporary Layoff Result in Right to Severance Pay?

December 21, 2009 at 9:00 pm by: Northern Exposure

By Derek Knoechel

In early 2008, the owner of a dental practice, having recently purchased the business, faced some difficult choices. Given what appeared to be a temporary downturn in revenues, the owners decided on a temporary layoff.

Continue Reading »

Wal-Mart Allowed to Close Unionized Store: Supreme Court of Canada

December 14, 2009 at 9:00 pm by: Northern Exposure

By Marc Ouellet and Louise Béchamp

Continue Reading »

When Employee Privacy and Social Media Collide

December 7, 2009 at 9:00 pm by: Northern Exposure

By Lyne Duhaime

An IBM employee from Quebec made headlines last month when her disability benefits were cut off by the insurance company after it saw pictures of her on Facebook. Despite being off work for depression, the employee had posted photos of herself on vacation at the beach and at a Chippendale’s show. When IBM’s disability carrier saw the photos on Facebook, it cut off her disability benefits. In its view, the employee no longer appeared to be disabled within the meaning of the insurance contract.

Continue Reading »

Federally Regulated Employees Required to Cross Another Union’s Picket Line

November 30, 2009 at 9:00 pm by: Northern Exposure

By Ida Martin

Imagine there is a group of federal government employees that are engaging in a lawful strike. Because of the physical location of your workplace, your employees can’t get to work without crossing the picket line. Your workers are unionized and have decided they won’t cross the picket line of the striking federal employees. As such, they are not at work. Can you require them to cross the picket line? What if there is a clause in your collective agreement that states that the company doesn’t expect members of the union to cross a picket line? Can you still insist?

Continue Reading »